{"id":2643,"date":"2018-08-06T11:27:34","date_gmt":"2018-08-06T16:27:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/?p=2643"},"modified":"2018-08-06T11:35:37","modified_gmt":"2018-08-06T16:35:37","slug":"a-simple-argument-against-premillennialism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/a-simple-argument-against-premillennialism\/","title":{"rendered":"A Simple Argument Against Premillennialism"},"content":{"rendered":"<hr \/>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>A Simple Argument Against Premillennialism<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<h6><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><em>By Aaron Brake<\/em><\/span><\/h6>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">There are three views within Christian eschatology regarding the millennium (or thousand-year reign of Christ) described in Revelation 20: premillennial, postmillennial, and amillennial. Very briefly, the premillennial view believes Christ returns <em>before<\/em> the thousand-year reign (hence \u201cpre\u201d), the postmillennial view believes Christ returns <em>after<\/em> the thousand-year reign (hence \u201cpost\u201d), and the amillennial view <em>denies<\/em> a literal, earthly reign of Christ (hence \u201ca\u201d), believing the millennial reign to be cotemporaneous with the present church age and spiritual in nature while Christ is seated at the right hand of the Father.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-2643-1' id='fnref-2643-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(2643)'>1<\/a><\/sup> The premillennial view is by far the most widely held view among evangelical Christians, especially in America.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">According to the premillennial view, after Christ returns at the Second Coming He will establish His kingdom on earth and physically reign from Jerusalem for 1,000 years (the \u201cmillennial reign\u201d), ushering in a time of great peace and prosperity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">One of the more peculiar and problematic teachings of the premillennial view is that sin and physical death will continue <em>after<\/em> the Second Coming of Christ. According to premillennialism, the Second Coming will <em>not<\/em> put an end to death or sin, rather both will continue as individuals in their natural earthly bodies inhabit and procreate on earth during the millennial reign. Pretribulational premillennialist Craig Blaising states, <\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u201calthough the millennial kingdom that John envisioned will see some of the dead raised to reign with Christ, death itself will not be completely abolished until after the Millennium has passed (Rev. 20:12-21:4).\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-2643-2' id='fnref-2643-2' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(2643)'>2<\/a><\/sup> \u00a0<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This is a non-negotiable, something premillennialists <em>must<\/em> believe because they need to give an account for (1) the sin which leads to the final rebellion in Revelation 20:7-10 at the end of the millennium and (2) the physical death of numerous believers and unbelievers during the millennial reign. But as I will argue, the idea that physical death continues after the Second Coming is something the New Testament <em>explicitly<\/em> denies.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-2643-3' id='fnref-2643-3' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(2643)'>3<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">If it can be shown from Scripture that physical death will end at the Second Coming, this is a decisive blow against the premillennial view. The argument can be placed in the following syllogism:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">If Scripture teaches that physical death will end at the Second Coming, then premillennialism is false.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Scripture teaches that physical death will end at the Second Coming.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Therefore, premillennialism is false.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-2643-4' id='fnref-2643-4' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(2643)'>4<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Premise 1 should be uncontroversial and agreed upon by everyone, including premillennialists. Again, according to the premillennialist timeline, one must believe that sin and physical death will continue on earth after the Second Coming. The argument then hinges on premise 2. Does Scripture teach that physical death will end at the Second Coming? One such passage that clearly teaches this is 1 Corinthians 15.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In 1 Corinthians 15:22-26 we read the following:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive. But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits, then at his coming those who belong to Christ. Then comes the end, when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">According to the premillennial interpretation of this passage, the millennial reign of Christ on earth fits between \u201chis coming\u201d (v. 23b) and \u201cthe end\u201d (v. 24a). The reasoning for this interpretation is as follows: just as there is a lengthy gap of time between the resurrection of Christ (v. 23a) and the resurrection of believers (v. 23b) lasting 2,000 years (so far), so there is also a lengthy gap between \u201chis coming\u201d (v. 23b) and \u201cthe end\u201d (v. 24a). Within this final gap between \u201chis coming\u201d and \u201cthe end\u201d is the millennial reign of Christ. Christ will reign during the millennium until all his enemies are destroyed, the last of which is death (vv. 25-26). Because the millennium is viewed by premillennialists as a literal, physical reign of Christ for 1,000 years on earth, sin and physical death will continue until the battle of Armageddon after which death is destroyed, the final judgment takes place, and the new heavens and earth are ushered in.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Sam Storms summarizes why this is important:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The point of dispute is the time of the \u201cend.\u201d The premillennialist argues that the \u201cend\u201d is the end or close of the millennial age, 1,000 years after Christ has returned to earth. The amillennialist argues that the \u201cend\u201d is the end or close of the <em>present<\/em> church age, signaled and brought to fruition by Christ\u2019s second coming.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">It seems clear that all one need do is demonstrate which of these two options is correct and the millennial debate would come to a close. This isn\u2019t as difficult as one might think<em>. Since both eschatological schools agree that Christ\u2019s reign consummates with the destruction of death, and since the destruction of death signals the end, we need only ascertain the time of \u201cdeath\u2019s death!\u201d<strong><sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-2643-5' id='fnref-2643-5' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(2643)'>5<\/a><\/sup><\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In other words, either physical death is destroyed at the Second Coming, or it is destroyed 1,000 years later according to the premillennial timeline. If Scripture indicates when physical death will come to an end, then we will know which millennial view is correct (and which is not). If Scripture teaches that death will end at the Second Coming, then premillennialism is false. So, does Paul elaborate further and reveal when physical death will end? As we continue to read 1 Corinthians 15, in particular verses 50-57, we find that Paul does indeed tell us when death is forever destroyed: at the Second Coming of Christ! In 1 Corinthians 15:50-57 Paul states,<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I tell you this, brothers: flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. Behold! I tell you a mystery. We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed. For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality. When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written: \u201cDeath is swallowed up in victory.\u201d \u201cO death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?\u201d The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God, who gives us victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Paul is revealing the mystery of the resurrection of believers. He told us earlier when this will take place when he said, \u201cthen at his coming those who belong to Christ\u201d (v. 23) will be \u201cmade alive\u201d (v. 22). At the Second Coming of Christ believers will be \u201cmade alive,\u201d i.e., resurrected and glorified. Historic premillennialist Craig Blomberg agrees that Paul is discussing the resurrection of believers at the Second Coming. In his commentary on 1 Corinthians 15:50-57 he states,<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The secret that Paul is revealing here is that believers\u2019 bodily resurrections will occur when Christ returns. Not all Christians will die first, since some will be alive when he comes back. But all will undergo whatever transformation is necessary to give them their glorified bodies. This change will take place instantaneously not gradually. The trumpet (v. 52a) was a stock metaphor in biblical literature to herald the end (cf. Joel 2:1; Zech. 9:14; Matt. 24:31; 1 Thess. 4:16; and the seven trumpets of Rev. 8:2-9:14).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">When all this has happened, then the way will be paved for the events of verses 24-28 to unfold. The climax of this series of events for believers is the destruction of death itself, as Isaiah had predicted (v. 54b, quoting Isa. 25:8).<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-2643-6' id='fnref-2643-6' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(2643)'>6<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Most importantly, Blomberg rightly points out that the climax of this series of events is the destruction of death itself! Paul is highlighting the fact that the end of death at the Second Coming of Christ is the fulfillment of Isaiah 25:8. There Isaiah states that God \u201cwill swallow up death forever; and the Lord GOD will wipe away tears from all faces, and the reproach of his people he will take away from all the earth.\u201d This raises a problem for the premillennial view.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><em>If premillennialism is true, how can it be fulfilled that God will \u201cswallow up death forever\u201d at the Second Coming of Christ when physical death will continue on earth for another 1,000 years?<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Let\u2019s summarize Paul\u2019s argument in 1 Corinthians 15 very quickly. The bodily resurrection of believers will take place when we are \u201cmade alive\u201d at the Second Coming of Christ (vv. 22-23) when \u201cthe dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall all be changed\u201d (v. 52b). When this rapture\/resurrection takes place, \u201cthe perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality\u201d (v. 54). Paul is clearly talking about the resurrection at the Second Coming of Christ in these passages. But notice what Paul says next. When all this happens at the Second Coming, \u201c<strong>THEN<\/strong> shall come to pass\u201d the fulfillment of Isaiah 25:8 where it was prophesied that God will \u201cswallow up death forever.\u201d Sam Storms explains further:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The \u201cend\u201d (1 Cor. 15:24) is marked by the destruction of the \u201clast enemy,\u201d namely, \u201cdeath\u201d (1 Cor. 15:26). All millennial views agree on this. And when is \u201cdeath\u201d destroyed? When does \u201cdeath\u201d cease to prevail? When is \u201cdeath\u201d going to be \u201cswallowed up in victory\u201d? Paul\u2019s answer couldn\u2019t have been clearer or more explicit: <em>Death is defeated, death dies, death is swallowed up in victory and is utterly and absolutely no more, as Isaiah 25:7-9 has prophesied, at the very moment that the last trumpet is sounded, at the very moment we are all changed, at the very moment when the perishable puts on the imperishable and the mortal puts on immortality! <\/em>And when, might I ask, is that? It is at the time of the second coming of Christ (and not some 1,000 years later as death continues to exert its horrid influence on the human race).<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-2643-7' id='fnref-2643-7' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(2643)'>7<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">There is one last important point regarding the fulfillment of Isaiah 25:8 which argues against the premillennial view. According to this verse, not only will God \u201cswallow up death forever\u201d but He will also \u201cwipe away tears from all faces.\u201d Again, Paul recognizes the fulfillment of Isaiah 25:8 at the Second Coming of Christ. But according to Revelation 21:1-4, God \u201cwill wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more\u201d (21:4) at the time of the creation of the new heavens and new earth. This raises another problem for the premillennial view.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><em>If premillennialism is true, how can it be fulfilled that God will \u201cwipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more\u201d at the Second Coming of Christ when tears and death will continue on earth for another 1,000 years?<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Let\u2019s look at our argument one more time:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">If Scripture teaches that physical death will end at the Second Coming, then premillennialism is false.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Scripture teaches that physical death will end at the Second Coming.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Therefore, premillennialism is false.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In summary, there simply is no space in Paul\u2019s eschatology for an intervening millennial kingdom between the Second Coming of Christ and the consummation of all things. For Paul, the Second Coming <strong>IS<\/strong> the consummation of all things.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Addendum: What About the Pre-Tribulation Rapture?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">As a final thought, any argument against premillennialism is also a de facto argument against the pre-tribulation rapture. The debate among Christians regarding the timing of the rapture is largely an intramural debate among premillennialists. Both the postmillennial and amillennial see the rapture and resurrection as taking place at the Second Coming, all of which Paul describes in 1 Thessalonians 4. Therefore, if premillennialism is false, the pre-tribulation rapture is also largely undermined.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\"><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<div class='footnotes' id='footnotes-2643'>\n<div class='footnotedivider'><\/div>\n<ol>\n<li id='fn-2643-1'> The amillennial position is also \u201cpost\u201d millennial in the sense that the Second Coming of Christ takes place after (\u201cpost\u201d) the present church age, i.e., the millennial reign. Amillennialists therefore\u00a0<em>do<\/em>\u00a0believe in a millennium despite the \u201ca\u201d prefix. Some prefer the term \u201crealized millennium.\u201d <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-2643-1'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-2643-2'> Craig Blaising, \u201cPremillennialism\u201d in <em>Three Views on the Millennium and Beyond<\/em> (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1999), 202. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-2643-2'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-2643-3'> I am indebted to Sam Storms and his book <em>Kingdom Come: The Amillennial Alternative<\/em> (Scotland: Mentor, 2015) for this argument. See chapter 5 of his book for an expanded and more detailed form of this argument. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-2643-3'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-2643-4'> This argument applies to both dispensational premillennialism and historic premillennialism since both believe the Second Coming precedes the millennial reign. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-2643-4'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-2643-5'> Storms, Kingdom Come, 145 (emphasis his). <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-2643-5'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-2643-6'>Craig Blomberg, <em>The NIV Application Commentary: 1 Corinthians <\/em>(Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994), 285. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-2643-6'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-2643-7'> Storms, <em>Kingdom Come<\/em>, Loc 2429 (emphasis his). <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-2643-7'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Simple Argument Against Premillennialism By Aaron Brake There are three views within Christian eschatology regarding the millennium (or thousand-year reign of Christ) described in Revelation 20: premillennial, postmillennial, and amillennial. Very briefly, the premillennial view believes Christ returns before the thousand-year reign (hence \u201cpre\u201d), the postmillennial view believes Christ returns after the thousand-year reign [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2645,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1511],"tags":[1516,1515,1513,1512,1514],"class_list":["post-2643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-eschatology","tag-aaron-brake","tag-eschatology","tag-is-premillennialism-true","tag-premillennialism","tag-rapture"],"views":5004,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2643"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2643\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2645"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/veritasfidei.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}